Author: Sean Ongley

  • The Risky Business of Your First Investment

    The Risky Business of Your First Investment

    Once More With Feeling: Get it Together

    I cannot stress enough the importance of starting from where you are, and in my previous finance posts, I have approached that idea from the perspective of someone like myself, before I took those first steps. I am not writing a finance series for people that have money and experience already, this is for people like myself: Poor folks. There are lessons in here for anyone that has not invested yet, including people that already make good money.

    From Russian-crafts.com.

    You can start with five surplus dollars a month, like a kid with a piggy bank. That is step one. Whatever bit of money you can hoard, you have to start with that, then find ways to increase that amount. The piggy bank is okay for the first few hundred bucks, but matryoshka dolls more closely resemble the savings investment scheme that is a grown up strategy.

    Living the path from where you began

    Life is a game of risk management. Every action is a risk. Going out is a risk. Staying home is a risk. Driving is. Walking is. At any moment, you could be struck by lightning, stray gunfire, be caught in a structural collapse, be stricken with illness — everything can happen. The deal is, the better you manage your risks the more likely you are to avoid disaster. You cannot avoid every expense, you cannot avoid every disaster. Like anyone, I’ve been screwed many times.

    If you’re doing well with it, then you will be better prepared for economic downturns and more likely to keep your assets improving over the long run. If you just react to every situation in life without a game plan, you will not manage shit. You will sell all your stocks at a loss exactly when you should be buying stocks. You will buy a new car because you got a dollar raise at work. You will budget for life in a short-sighted kind of way.

    My viewpoint, well into my thirties, was that if I paid my rent and bills and I still had $100 and a paycheck coming, then I was solid. I happily spent 60% of my income on a downtown apartment. That apartment was a luxury for me, but it disabled me from saving money. In fact, I had to rent a cheap room to save money to get into that apartment in the first place.

    Your circumstances will rule over you forever, until you take ownership of them. Sometimes there are hard decisions to make, like giving up the apartment, leaving spongey people to dry (speaking from experience as a spongey person), leaving jobs that don’t pay you right, between this and that, and the other.

    Until you’re beyond wealthy, you will always be sacrificing luxuries and comforts, if you want money later. So long as you’re spending all your money now, or worse, credit cards, then you are assuring yourself that you will not have money later. Credit cards are a strategy to themselves, but I started with no credit card, so I’ll deal with credit and debt in a future piece.

    Most folks starting to save money have a short term objective. When you’re inexperienced, you’re saving up for something. If you’re serious, then it will be forever. You should have in mind something like buying a house, starting a business, or funding an investment, while remembering that saving is just going to be a part of your budget, for life.

    However much you earn and however much you expend, it is up to you to analyze what you can sacrifice to maximize your surplus income. Leverage your skills so that you can save money at home, earn extra money if necessary, or simply occupy your time so you aren’t just burning cash. Hobbies are proven to maintain health and youth, saving on bills. There are ways to turn hobbies into secondary income, and that is a very efficient strategy to building wealth.

    What Am I Saving For?

    Stocks and cryptocurrencies are moving fast right now, in these mid-pandemic market conditions. The stock market it behaving with certainty that the economy will reopen, and it hopes that the trifecta of stimulus (cheap oil, loans/grants, and UBI) will have bombastic short term results on quarterly profits, while accelerating innovations that will reduce corporate expenditures. 

    Most stock picks right now are still undervalued. Hundreds of solid companies are trading at 5-year lows right now, and I am talking about blue chip stocks, brands that will survive this, no problem. There are opportunities, like cannabis, that have actually performed well during the pandemic but were already suffering from a supply glut. Real estate stocks are down, many of them more than 75%, but these companies offer some of the most stable, high-dividend securities available, and are expected to bounce back.

    Cryptocurrencies are booming as bitcoin is approaching its halving event, in which the mining reward for BTC is cut by 50%. Trading now around $9,000, as demand is hot and supply is cut, its value should recover 2017 peaks and exceed them. Historically, the value quadruples or better in between halving periods, bubbles and bursts, but continues on a bullish trend after that. This is the built-in supply control limit. It simulates a gold mine with limited supply, the opposite of debt-driven fiat currencies.

    Here is an example of risk management. If you just got your stimulus check, and you put all $1,200 into BTC, then you have a fair chance of doubling it within summer, and quadrupling it within a year. In this plan, the first risk is that bitcoin could totally fail, so you lose most of your principle. Risk #2 is a happy one: Do you pull your money when it doubles, or do you keep it in and hope it quadruples? Let’s analyze this.

    The odds are that bitcoin will continue on its trajectory of exponential growth for years, maybe decades — as the whole supply takes at least a century to mine. That is the design of the technology. Major flaws expose it to failure: If public sentiment turns or the cryptography is broken, then it plummets to zero. 

    If you buy about one ounce of gold, currently trading around $1,500, then you might gain a few percentage points on that, year over year, but it will always be valuable, because it is a commodity. If the whole internet shuts down, your BTC is worthless, and the dollar might even fail, so gold will be everything. It is safer to put it in gold, but in the short term, it seems more likely to profit with bitcoin. 

    So how do you manage this risk? The safe bet is to spread it around. You can buy $600 in bitcoin, and $600 in gold. Even more safe would be to invest it four ways: Open an Individual Retirement Account (IRA), open a stock brokerage account, create a bitcoin wallet, and buy some gold coins. You almost can’t go wrong like this. You have two different, volatile investments to be aggressive with, and two passive investments in which you just wait and add to over the course of your life.

    The second risk is how to manage your profits as they come. If you’re trying to maximize your profit, you should wait until bitcoin quadruples before selling any of it. So here is another strategy. Again, it is about doing both. When BTC doubles, you can pull your principle investment of $1,200, put it in your IRA with a CD, let it grow for a lifetime. Keep your profit at play in BTC and it will probably double again. Or you can convert that into different cryptocurrencies, of which there are now hundreds. You have a cash farm going, basically, as you have bought the field at $1,200. All you do now is till it, and replant the seeds of the fruit.

    What if Saving Was Also Investing?

    When I really truly started saving money in 2017, it just sat in a savings account, earning credit union dividends — like $2 all year. If I had deposited most of it into an IRA then I could have taken a huge tax deduction that year, then rolled that figure back in. This is probably the safest way to save toward a house. The least risky, the most straight forward.

    Alternatively, I could have purchased blue chip stocks, like Ford, and taken their dividends. You see, a savings account is a storage of cash, while gold, stocks, and crypto are storages of value. If Ford goes up by 5% and pays dividends, that crushes any savings account by a long shot, but the timing on your sale has to be good. If you’re saving to buy property, timing is everything, and you don’t want to get hung up with market fluctuations.

    It is difficult to calculate, because it was growing gradually, then exploded in November and December — who knows when I would have sold it — but if I had stored my savings in Bitcoin, I think I could have tripled my savings. I was not experienced yet, so it’s all about hindsight and learning a lesson from it. Obviously the best performing asset of 2017 (Bitcoin) is where I should have put my money. I had contacts in the ecosystem by 2015 and really should have entered at that time, so I kick myself in the ass a little too much.

    Everything I have learned about trading, I have learned by risking small amounts, and running simulations. In fact, my first simulation was high school economics class. It was the “Roaring 90’s” back then, so I am not surprised that my stock picks were successful. Ever since, I had a fascination for economics, but eventually in 2016, I mocked up a portfolio at Google Finance. It is hard to understand why I did not begin trading until 2019.

    There are several digital mock portfolio platforms online, or do it like I did in high school: Look up the day ending quotes in the newspaper and produce a paper graph. Or you can make a spreadsheet on your computer, watch quotes on Bloomberg, and pretend to make sale/purchase orders. Produce a balance sheet and see if you are capable of turning a profit. Good news: You don’t have to calculate brokerage fees because they are no longer common for retail investors.

    If you have an extra hundred bucks, you can open a stock brokerage account and toss in some extra cash — some of them offer cryptocurrencies plus stocks. Suppose I throw $10 at Bitcoin and make $0.50 back, the steps I take are the same as if I played $10,000, to earn $500 back. By the time you have made a hundred low-risk trades, you’re ready to up your game. And if you don’t enjoy the game, don’t play it. Invest in another way.

    The main way to mitigate risk is to leverage expendable money. You pay your bills, you have at least a month’s savings above and beyond your immediate expenses. I recommend three months, but you manage your own plan. After that, you can play that money with no worries. It is not gambling, because you are purchasing shares in companies. Options are like gambling, but I won’t go there yet. Sometimes companies go belly up and your stocks fall to zero, sometimes they skyrocket. The portfolio balance needs to profit overall. But my primary rule is never to sell at a loss.

    We have discussed risk management, savings, entering stocks and cryptocurrencies, and some strategies toward that end. My next installment will detail how I work with my portfolio. I’ll discuss digging in, digging out, buying the dip, dividend stacking, fractional shares, day trading, and I’ll compare a few known platforms so that you can think about how and why to use brokerage services.

    If you want to start trading and to support me for writing these free blogs, then please join Robinhood with my activation link and we’ll both get a free stock.

  • From Farm to Stable

    From Farm to Stable

    The rise and fall of The Point.

    Through the summer of 2012, I was living in a tent on a farm. It was great. I had rented a house on that farm years before. But this time, I was trying out tent life. I loved it. I’ll some day devote a full story to it.

    The opportunity came to rent a house just in time to avoid October rains. Portland’s climate is kind of abrupt. You can have damn near zero rains between July 1 and September 1, but really, it just begins dumping rain by the end of September and it is relentless. My tent was protected by roped up tarps, which is good for a day or two, but without drainage, the ground eventually turns to mud.

    This house (not the tent) was in the same neighborhood that I had been organizing music festivals for years, in St. Johns (near the tent). The landlord needed someone to recover damages from his previous tenants, the neighborhood party animals. He let his house get wrecked for years, without checking on the condition of it. He was chill like that.

    Freshly pitched tent with canopy. The kitchen would go to the left.

    My situation also demanded that I keep a commercial office for my newly expanded non-profit, InterArts, as we had just taken on the Cathedral Park Jazz Festival, successfully completing the 2012 season. A work-live situation would be the most efficient way to keep me on the job for no pay. It would turn out not to be enough.

    Anisha Scanlon is the person that brought the opportunity to me. She wanted an office for her own purposes. She had no money, but I was doing okay, at the time. This was a moment of mutual opportunity. She depended on me, I depended on her, so we just went for it. Anisha picked up the lead to get in the property. We all knew the previous tenants, but it was the neighbor that wanted us in there. The property included two homes, so we shared landlords with the neighbor — in fact we shared backyards.

    Our mutual friend Todd Guess, at that time unemployed, was hustling his permaculture training and design skills, so he looked at this as an opportunity to consult us through it as part of his portfolio. Other community members joined us in providing materials and labor until we pulled off a minor miracle.

    We managed to fully repaint the exterior of the house in October, and finish landscaping within November, as we had an unusually dry season, followed by a soaking wet winter. We shifted to the interior in the knick of time.

    See more of The Point on my portfolio page.

    This project significantly educated me on home construction and maintenance. This was not quite a remodel, but close to it. We painted everywhere, repaired or replaced kitchen and bath facilities, added new electrical circuits, and more. From the top down, we finished the whole job out with new flooring.

    Once everything was done, I got to flesh it out with an art gallery, a complete office and multimedia suite, and workspace for up to six individuals comfortably in the offices.

    The grand opening party went off well, I really believed that it was going to continue to go well. One problem began that I didn’t have time to curate the gallery and we did not gain traction to utilizing the house for revenue.

    The fate of my non-profit hinged on a filing error that causes, according to an obscure detail in the Pension Protection Act, automatic revocation of federal 501(c)(3) status. Not an irredeemable mistake, but it was the straw that broke this camel’s back. It would cost us however much time would be involved with filing a new application, plus the $400 fee.

    I was tortured with technical non-profit law and all the mumbo jumbo that goes on in the whole non-profit administration field, including professional backstabbing, cut throat competition, popularity contents and all that. I have more memories than I care to recall of supposedly compassionate liberals scrambling all over one another for position at some non-profit corporation. Gross.

    That year, I organized for a work travel visa for the Brazilian group Ventura Trio, but the State Department delayed the application until they missed their flight. I worked 16-hour days for the full two weeks leading into and including the Cathedral Park Jazz Festival, in 2013, only to have one of my headliners cock blocked by a hegemonic immigration policy. Literally within the same month, the IRS revoked our tax exempt status. I was beyond stressed out. No pay.

    The way you get your executive leadership (that’s me) paid is to invite wealthy people to your Board of Directors. I required only a $25 membership fee, very low compared to most organizations. Members could waive that fee with, I think, 12 hours of volunteer time. So I attracted other poor folks to the Board.

    InterArts put on No.Fest 2008 through 2011. We split, that is Jeffrey Helwig took over No.Fest in 2012 and I absorbed Cathedral Park Jazz Festival. I ran that for two years. Revenue went year over year roughly like this: $200 (08) $2000 (09) $2500 (10) $4000 (11) $23,000 (12) $32,000 (13). While I gradually increased the office budget, and I slept in my office, I never paid myself a check. I would survive an audit. But it was precarious. Fortunately, I could legally sleep in my office at The Point. It was a huge step up.

    There is leadership potential in me, but I write here in this blog openly about my flaws. There is a pathology to it, a history that makes sense of my erratic patterns of mixed success. I have this dual edge, I can only pull off the persona rich people want from me for so long until I crack. I really can’t do it. Most people I meet are fully compartmentalized. I never could do that. So I never got funding to pay any staff beyond event-based contracting. By the way, I earned a RACC grant in 2013 to pay $10,000 to musicians at CPJazz.

    That September, I did my annual deep dive into contemporary art and performance via PICA’s T:BA Festival. I had been contributing media since 2008. It was such a nice break from producing events, rather I got to be the commentary, the observer, the journalist. I was feeling a longing to take back my role as a creative person, not an administrator. And I wanted to expand on my long-lived role in media. I found myself emotionally resolved to dissolve InterArts.

    Rather than keep the house, or slog through IRS filings to keep my non-profit, I just gave everything up. This sealed my reputation among a certain group that I was prone to overheat and burn out. It was true — but it’s a self-fulfilling prophecy when those same people do nothing to support you if not directly oppose you. I left town for several months, coming back to start a whole new project, turning away from St. Johns, as for me it was scorched earth.

    So that is the rise and fall of the The Point. I’ll tell you what, it led to a whole new collection of adventures. After selling all my unneeded stuff, and working out a sudden exit with the landlord, as InterArts had ran its budget and I couldn’t afford the whole house, I embarked on a long form version of my annual holiday season travel through California to Tucson.

    It looked like the best planning I had ever given to a trip, but I returned flat broke, without the car I left with, had been investigated by some kind of law enforcement, and a drum set that comedian Andrew Michaan eventually transported to me, for nothing, because I’m a bum. I crashed on the floor of my good friends’ art party house until I found a room for rent.

    This next period of my life I regard as the THRU period, where I embarked on the ludicrous project of starting up a media company. Not that the idea was ludicrous, but my capacity to do it was not compatible to the idea. I was ahead of myself. Start from where you are. That is how The Point happened. It was successful. I let it go. Chaos ensued.

    I see how this pattern works now. The universe arranges itself toward your intentions, but when you abruptly change those intentions, it pushes back. It has to fully reorient you within its system even though you are a disoriented person feeding it confused intentions. At least that is how I look at it.

  • New Synth Jam

    New Synth Jam

    HEAR AUDIO IN NEW TAB.

    Please enjoy the dusty electronic noise produced herein. Dusty from sitting inside its case for five years, and performed by a dusty player. I could not remember how to do things I used to readily perform. Additionally, I cut myself off from music during this time that I’ve been writing about lately, moving to Philadelphia and squaring off my financial basis for the first time in my adult life.

    I think this track proves that I haven’t gone soft. I still got the guts of the experimental, improvising musician in me. And it feels so good to just produce something. I don’t care how many mistakes I made in the process — the piece is kind about that.

    At this point, I have a secure home music studio that I can use 24/7. I can afford at least an hour per day on average to work on music. I still have work to do in the studio, to make it a functional studio. This piece is just the maiden voyage. It’s going to get so much better.

    Performed with an ARP Odyssey mk2 vintage, and Logic Studio instruments.

  • Could “Intellectual Apartheid” Be a Thing?

    Could “Intellectual Apartheid” Be a Thing?

    Those not watching our planet becoming a mess of conflict may be too embroiled in their own concerns to see it happening. Some people, not just social scientists, journalists, and the like, make it their personal concern to see how the world and its leaders are managing their business. If someone has been observing this conflict over time, it is clear we are in a period of great tension. It is not yet civil war, but threats are made. We fight over the same reality, the same world, because from our own eyes it is somehow different from one person to the next.

    Because there is not a consistent honest narrative across media platforms, which are ideologically fragmented, those differences lead us to fight amongst each other, rather than observe the common threat, which is unfettered power over the people.

    Some argue that it is in fact the consolidation of corporate media, from hundreds of local and regional media companies, and broadcasters, to just a handful. This is a valid argument, however complicated by the new media ecosystem evolving out of podcasting. I think we would be remiss not to analyze the phenomenon of literacy and self-liberation from intellectual oppression.

    The United States has produced more citizens with college degrees — sometimes multiple degrees — than ever before, by an incredible margin. The gender gap narrowed and crossed over in 2015 so that women are now better educated than men. This is an incredible reversal since 1940, when women also first entered the work force.

    The percentage of Americans with four years of college education or more has improved from 5% to 35%, which doesn’t sound so impressive until I point out this represents a 700% increase since 1940 — we had already become a modernized nation with world leading literacy rates and universities across 48 states.

    Without getting into the weeds, we also know that literacy rates have improved globally, while ethnic minorities and immigrants enter higher education at increasing rates. Speaking as a White Male, I am not threatened because I believe in a diverse world where gender roles and ethnic cultures are celebrated in a political-economic system that cherishes everyone’s inherent contribution. That is not what we have now.

    The dominant class demands specific social attitudes and economic adherences or you and your business will not be able to survive. Millions of Americans reflect the feeling that they have to compartmentalize their real opinions and feelings from one relationship to the next. I believe this is natural, to some extent. You should not be intimate with your boss, or submissive to your spouse. What I am concerned about is people conforming their behavior to accommodate those that hold power over them, be it their boss or their spouse. We should all be nice to each other, polite, and considerate, out of genuine concern, not fear of repercussion. Civility is disappearing as a symptom of what I am analyzing here.

    I watch the privileged white liberal class going around calling their opponents racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and xenophobic, while the number of white males in positions of power, their educational advantage down to their share of labor jobs, all declining.

    Let me tell you what I am: I am arachnophobic, and I’ve been one step ahead of the spider my entire life. The spider is the global elite, friends, and their webs are in the media, the education system, politics, and they drive the economics. 

    When your identity is rooted in economic class, you are together with the 90% of Americans. Only the upper 10% have seen any kind of wage increase since 1970, while the 1% enjoyed an incredible period of wealth accumulation over the same time. The average CEO was paid about ten times wealthier than their lowest paid employee in 1950, whereas today they factor in the hundreds, and that is on average. If you compare Warren Buffet to his janitors, or Jeff Bezos to his fulfillment clerks, we’re looking at an easy thousandfold disparity. Everybody is marginalized in today’s economics.

    Nobody wants to study the decline of the American white male out of fear of repercussions from the dominant liberal class. I could be labeled alt-right just for observing this even though my personal ideology puts all genders and ethnicities into an anarchist-libertarian cooperative society that would make it impossible for any single identity to become dominant, because power is not held in leaders, rather, in cooperative bodies.

    I do not get to live in that world, I am required to abide by the neoliberal capitalist framework in America regardless of the cognitive dissonance this puts me through, regardless of the mediocrity of my superiors, and the failures of their systems.

    Why is the steady decline of workforce participation among white males totally ignored in the narrative of white privilege? Because narratives aren’t facts. Facts educate the mind. Narratives entertain and condition the mind. You are better controlled by narrative. They give us the facts, but very few people study them. I suggest you study them.

    Women and ethnic minorities competed for wages, won the jobs. Employers got away with reducing salaries for all.

    It is good to see wealth transferred from the few to the many, but that is not what happened in the period following civil rights and women’s liberation. The total share of earnings was diluted by workers accustomed to less pay, in a system where entry workers cannot negotiate their wage.

    The American workforce participation rate declined, most sharply in 2009 when President Obama supposedly saved the economy, and it never recovered. Important to understand when unemployment goes down but the workforce participation rate remains flat, then the percentage of remaining unemployed transfers over to workforce participation rates. Lo and behold it was down 5% from 2007 as President Trump touted the best unemployment rate of all time.

    Corporations hired women for decades, improving their wages to the detriment of total household wealth. See this clearly, because it is good that women and non-whites are getting better jobs and pay on a positive trend line since 1970, but it is unfortunate that average wages have flattened over the same curve, thereby reducing household wealth over time, stealing from everybody, installing the two-income paradigm.

    I am not even discussing the extraordinary drag on American wages resulting from free trade agreements with China and Mexico. Millions of good paying jobs were exported. The whole phenomenon is complex, but to simplify, we no longer compete only with American laborers and immigrants, we also compete where we cannot even access the labor market.

    The few have become less and less a group of white men. The 1% would prefer it that you not see that they are also becoming more diverse than ever, because they know they have an effective narrative at play when the people fight amongst each other for scraps.

    All you have to do is look at the Forbes Billionaire List to see who the billionaires actually are. They belong to a special club, and they know one another. It is the billionaire scene. It is far more classist than racist, or sexist. The foundation of identity politics, few understand, is class identity.

    I am a white male, but my history shows a combination of factors that are comparable to communities of color. I graduated high school with a D average. I worked hard after that, earning a 3.65 GPA for my Associates Degree at community college. I have never earned, in my best years, the median individual income. I have been fired from several jobs due to personality conflicts. I rarely get called for job interviews for anything paying more than $12 per hour. I have experienced housing insecurity. My Father has a felony on his record, a problem that haunted our household. They cleaned homes and offices for a living for ten years. Half of my public school classmates were non-white in the Mexican immigrant neighborhood I grew up in. I was latchkey, they rarely helped with schoolwork because they usually worked themselves into the night. By Junior High, I did most of the house cleaning. We moved to Arizona to fend off rising costs in California, and because my parents had no risk management skills, because finance is an upper class trait that nobody taught them, and they went bankrupt. Their parents were gambling addicts and alcoholics. I was a first-generation college graduate, again, from community college.

    Add to the balance that I was born into the Church of Scientology, making me a weirdo at school. I am permanently traumatized from being identified as the outsider, ever year K-12, because that identity was instilled so early on. My parents bypassed personal responsibilities by funneling me through Scientology coursework, further alienating me from them, from myself, and the average person at once. My entire adult life can be observed as a struggle from one position to the next, never quite fitting in, often feeling dismissed on personal grounds, then emotionally lashing out from it, bringing myself down and burning bridges all the time.

    I struggle to find my privilege. I am a highly marginalized individual with a story that doesn’t fit into the logic of identity neoliberalism, just because I am a white male does not mean all the doors have opened for me. Mostly they have slammed shut. 

    Don’t tag the victim card on me, because this is not the point. The point is, if personality is what gets you passed the job interview, that enables people to be taken seriously in debates, that makes you a social media influencer, a television journalist, then personality is exactly what makes me unprivileged, rather, I am disastrously marginalized. And it demonstrates class privilege above all.

    If our world is a cult of personality, then those folks who do not match up will be prevented from sharing their talents and contributing their genius. This is the world I believe we live in. It is driven by a global financial order, not a white one. It infuriates me to see the white liberal class turn the truly marginalized artist class into a mouthpiece for the global elite.

    My argument is that personality has become the number one factor for marginalization today. What matters is your orientation to authority. This is why China and the Chinese people are close to knocking the United States off the global pyramid. Again, I am not threatened, because I know the people of China want liberty too. The more educated they become, the more they will demand liberty. That is why Xi Jinping has consolidated power and control using internet technology, in addition to good old brute force. That is why the Occupy Movement was shut down in brute force. That is why we have been quarantined.

    As more and more folks are educated, there are personalities that don’t fit the mold who take their genius into manual labor, doing rote work, where they are stuck with their brilliant ideas for which they cannot access capital. If we are lucky, we get to listen to podcasts at work, while yearning to interject that conversation rather than pack boxes for Amazon. We are deeply frustrated. Some folks are inclined to fall into depression and addiction, so lo and behold, we have the opioid epidemic at play. Then the liberal elite solution is just to give them safe injection sites and to selectively enforce trafficking laws while continuing to deprive people of universal health care, the only thing that would actually prevent rampant self-medication.

    I suppose the bottom line I am making is that most people now are smart enough to see that the narratives are not adding up, the stories we’re hearing are not real, but we blame and shift our trust into different authorities rather than awaken our powers of discernment. We seek enemies of convenience when we fail to see the common enemy. I know that folks are smart enough to realize when they have been duped, so I worry about that day coming, because I think it is a little bit backed up by now.

    We are smart enough to develop arguments and have opinions, but we are not cautious enough to hold off before pointing the finger. We are deliberately placed into this social media industry as willing tools of their profit to become addicted to the fear and anger that it generates in us. This is a clearly understood, documented marketing strategy. It is disgusting.

    I believe that someday we will come to realize that we live under the invisible regime of intellectual apartheid. If this is a form of apartheid, where the most intelligent people in the country are told what to think by the media, by the politicians, and by social media influencers, there will not be conformity without resistance. I believe we are watching right now the divide reach unprecedented tension, and it will snap.

    With the most educated populace ever, the pressures will continue to mount until our workplaces are democratized, our financial systems are democratized, our scientific discourse is democratized — a whole revolution of liberalization within the American constitution. I believe that our constitution and our system can accommodate extraordinary progress over time. All advancements can be made peacefully.

    I don’t know if we need to be led out of this, or if we need to wake up individually. If I am right, we’ll see authoritarianism rise to be challenged and defeated, or completely defeat us.

  • Artist Profile of the Dilletantric Duo

    This video is not one that I produced or worked on, rather, I was the subject, alongside my unlikely buddy at the time, Shane. This one compliments my last music post, “The Broken Armed Drummer,” about Shane’s injury before touring with my band Death Worth Living.

    Shane and I played in DWL together, we lived and worked together on this farm, and we played music almost every day in the barn — shared spliffs, watched TV — and I coined the name for us: Dilettantric Duo. See what I did there?

    Adam Keller had a local house venue called Rererato. He therefore knew us and decided that this would be a unique moment to document: The relationship between a heteronormative platonic male couple.

    This is the short film produced by Adam Keller in 2009, simply titled, Artist Profile: Shane Schneider and Sean Ongley.